| From: | Jean-Michel POURE <jm(at)poure(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Build farm |
| Date: | 2003-11-24 09:14:48 |
| Message-ID: | 200311241014.48813.jm@poure.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Le Vendredi 21 Novembre 2003 19:47, Tom Lane a écrit :
> I think the main value of a build farm is that we'd get nearly immediate
> feedback about the majority of simple porting problems. Your previous
> arguments that it wouldn't smoke everything out are certainly valid ---
> but we wouldn't abandon the regression tests just because they don't
> find everything. Immediate feedback is good because a patch can be
> fixed while it's still fresh in the author's mind.
Dear friends,
We have a small build farm for pgAdmin covering Win32, FreeBSD and most GNU/
Linux systems. See http://www.pgadmin.org/pgadmin3/download.php#snapshots
The advantage are immediate feedback and correction of problems. Also, in a
release cycle, developers and translators are quite motivated to see their
work published fast.
Of course, it is always hard to "mesure" the real impact of a build farm. My
opinion it that it is quite positive, as it helps tighten the links between
people, which is free software is mostly about.
Cheers,
Jean-Michel Pouré
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD | 2003-11-24 11:16:22 | Re: Sponsoring enterprise features |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-11-24 06:36:57 | Re: Executable files in CVS |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-11-24 12:55:01 | Re: Build farm |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2003-11-23 17:24:29 | Re: New Event |