| From: | Kurt Roeckx <Q(at)ping(dot)be> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 7.4 logging bug. |
| Date: | 2003-11-21 17:25:51 |
| Message-ID: | 20031121172551.GA30971@ping.be |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 02:49:28AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <Q(at)ping(dot)be> writes:
> > It's still logging the "recycled transation log file". Is that
> > send to stdout instead of stderr maybe?
>
> No, it all goes to stderr. But that output comes from a different
> subprocess. Not sure why that subprocess would still have working
> stderr if others don't ... any ideas anyone?
It seems quiting and starting psql "fixed" it. So I guess it's
the backend that had the problem. So it was a different
subprocess.
> Does cygwin have any equivalent of strace/ktrace? It'd be useful
> to see whether the write() calls are still being issued or not.
It has a strace, but when I use it I get a nice exception. I
never really got either strace or gdb to work properly under
cygwin when attachting to an existing process.
Kurt
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | James Rogers | 2003-11-21 17:51:07 | Re: Sponsoring enterprise features |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-11-21 17:09:00 | Re: [HACKERS] More detail on settings for pgavd? |