From: | Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SuSE RPMs available for PostgreSQL 7.4 |
Date: | 2003-11-19 17:18:29 |
Message-ID: | 200311191218.29207.lowen@pari.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 11:59 am, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Lamar Owen writes:
> > Hey, Peter, for one who consistently complains about lack of consistency
> > in naming, you completely diregarded the precedent that has previously
> > been set for naming RPM releases (regardless of the source).
> These are SuSE RPMs. They were build by SuSE following the conventions
> that SuSE has used for their past releases. So who are we to argue with
> that?
The place they were put. The 'customary place' has been
v{version}/RPMS/{distribution} so that they would be in
pub/binary/v7.4/RPMS/suse-{version}. Their source RPM would go there too. I
have no problem with the name of the RPM's themselves, just where they were
put. As long as they don't have a PGDG in the release tag I'm happy with the
package names.
> > And then you neglected to put group write permissions on the directory so
> > that other binaries could be uploaded.
> I see
> drwxrwxr-x 3 petere pgsql 512 Nov 17 20:47 binary/v7.4/
> If someone else put the group write permissions in there in between, I
> apologize.
I asked Marc to do it.
I would kindof liked a heads up on this; I had some plans for the RPMset that
I'm now going to delay. But it is good for SuSE users to have something
there now, I agree.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-19 17:38:26 | Re: defferable update & unique |
Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2003-11-19 17:12:56 | Re: defferable update & unique |