Re: [HACKERS] Win32 Port WAS: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 Port WAS: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Date: 2003-11-18 17:34:03
Message-ID: 20031118173403.GH5228@libertyrms.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:24:25AM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Well, based on the feedback we're getting from the 7.4 release, the #1 issue
> for non-postgresql users who are interested enough to post to message boards
> is "Where is the Windows Port?" This gets mentioned roughly 10 times as

This is also, by the way, a reason not to say, "_X_ is planned for
the next release," unless there is acutal working code kicking
around. Lots of people saw the remarks (I am among the guilty for
repeating it, I think) that a Windows port seemed to be planned for
7.4. So some of us were guilty of flogging vapourware, I'm afraid.

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Rawnsley 2003-11-18 17:43:00 Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the near future???
Previous Message David Fetter 2003-11-18 17:31:56 Freshmeat?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Reinoud van Leeuwen 2003-11-18 17:40:40 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-11-18 17:24:25 Re: [HACKERS] Win32 Port WAS: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?