| From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Release cycle length |
| Date: | 2003-11-18 13:18:27 |
| Message-ID: | 20031118131827.GD30809@wolff.to |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 20:08:41 -0500,
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > The time from release 7.3 to release 7.4 was 355 days, an all-time
> > high. We really need to shorten that.
>
> Why is that?
End users will find it useful.
I started using 7.4 from CVS early on because check constraints for domains
were available.
With a long release cycle you have to wait a long time to get any of
the features in a release when some of them may have been developed
early in the release cycle.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Claudio Natoli | 2003-11-18 13:31:41 | Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| Previous Message | Marek Lewczuk | 2003-11-18 13:00:19 | Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Grabmller | 2003-11-18 13:32:01 | Re: [HACKERS] Release cycle length |
| Previous Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2003-11-18 12:30:06 | Re: [HACKERS] Release cycle length |