From: | Christoph Haller <ch(at)rodos(dot)fzk(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com (Mike Mascari) |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
Date: | 2003-11-18 10:20:41 |
Message-ID: | 200311180920.KAA03562@rodos |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
>
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > If Win32 actually makes it into 7.5 then yes I believe 8.0 would be
> > appropriate.
>
> It might be interesting to track Oracle's version number viz. its
> feature list. IOW, a PostgreSQL 8.0 database would be feature
> equivalent to an Oracle 8.0 database. That would mean:
>
> 1) PITR
> 2) Distributed Tx
> 3) Replication
> 4) Nested Tx
> 5) PL/SQL Exception Handling
>
> IMHO, a major version number jump should at least match the delta in
> features one finds in the commercial segment with their major version
> number bumps. Otherwise, I suspect it would be viewed as window
> dressing...
Good point. To me the best argument against so far.
>
> Could be wrong, though...
>
> Mike Mascari
> mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com
>
>
Regards, Christoph
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jussi Mikkola | 2003-11-18 10:25:31 | Year of the Open-Source Database |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2003-11-18 09:45:56 | Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sean Chittenden | 2003-11-18 10:41:01 | Re: Release cycle length |
Previous Message | William ZHANG | 2003-11-18 10:03:27 | What's the difference between int2 and int16? |