| From: | Jean-Michel POURE <jm(at)poure(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Raphaël Enrici <blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr>, "Adam H(dot) Pendleton" <fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: wxGTK2ud BuildRequires dependencies |
| Date: | 2003-11-18 08:18:06 |
| Message-ID: | 200311180918.06715.jm@poure.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Le Lundi 17 Novembre 2003 21:55, Raphaël Enrici a écrit :
> I think Adam is right regarding dependencies, it's not usefull (and can
> get you to mistake if packages change) to specify all these
> dependencies. FYI Debian's dependencies I use are these (I cut debian
> specific things)
>
> Build-Depends: libgtk2.0-dev, gcc, g++, libjpeg62-dev, libpng-dev (>>
> 1.2.0) | libpng12-dev (>> 1.2.0) | libpng2-dev , libtiff3g-dev
Dear Adam, Raphaël, Andreas
With your explanations, it seems that:
- Build Time dependencies are quite limited,
- We are going to stick to wxGTK2ud.
So, I agree with you all. This is the power of the Internet, we can discuss
and arrive to a solution pretty quickly. Thank!
Adam: I am not very familiar with conditional statements in RPM specs. Could
you give me an example of a conditional statement in an RPM spec? I will work
out the dependencies for other systems.
About Andreas patches: I hope that they will be integrated quite fast. I don't
understand the logic behind all this. It seems "unreal" to keep a broken
wxWindows for a long time.
Cheers,
Jean-Michel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2003-11-18 09:09:48 | Re: wxGTK2ud BuildRequires dependencies |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2003-11-18 08:08:06 | Re: wxGTK2ud BuildRequires dependencies |