Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Date: 2003-11-18 02:41:20
Message-ID: 200311180241.hAI2fKk00107@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Also note that most major number
> > changes in the past weren't because the features were cool, but because
> > the project has moved to a new phase. I don't see any such move
> > happening.
>
> Now that is interesting. I missed that. Can you explain how that worked
> with 7.0?

We stopped crashing in 7.0, or was it 6.5 --- that was our milestone, I
think. :-)

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Sherry 2003-11-18 04:18:48 Press coverage in Australia
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2003-11-18 02:22:22 Re: advocacy.postgresql.org: page dedicated to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2003-11-18 02:45:43 Re: logical column position
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-18 02:35:21 Re: libpq thread safety