Re: cvs head? initdb?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: cvs head? initdb?
Date: 2003-11-16 17:57:24
Message-ID: 200311161757.hAGHvOM10184@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jan Wieck wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
> >
> > but how do you test this if you cant run them both against each other to
> > compare? (initally running vs 7.4 does tell you something, but even now, 7.5
> > improved cross datatype index improvments could skew the results of any
> > comparisons)
>
> Right. But with the current two candidates (LRU and ARC) in the field
> only, there isn't much to compare. If someone wants to implement another
> algorithm, I will be happy to put the required switchboard (something
> like the jump table in smgr) into the code. Right now I see much more
> bang for the buck in creating the background writer.

Better Journalistic Manipulator ==> BJM. :-)

_B_ruce _J_. _M_omjian.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-11-16 17:59:43 Re: interesting SIGNAL 10 (BUSERR) on CVS
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-11-16 17:38:52 Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code