Re: ATA disks and RAID controllers for database servers

From: Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>
To: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in
Subject: Re: ATA disks and RAID controllers for database servers
Date: 2003-11-15 14:44:51
Message-ID: 20031115094451.6cf95631.threshar@torgo.978.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 14:07:40 +1300
Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> wrote:

>
> Clearly it is possible to obtain very good performance with write
> caching on using RAID0, and if you have a UPS together with good backup
> practice then this could be the way to go.
>
> With caching off there is a considerable decrease in performance,
> however this performance may be "good enough" if viewed in a
> cost-benefit-safely manner.
>
>

UNless the controller itself has a battery backed cache it is dangerous - there are many more failures than losing power. Ie, blowing out the power supply or cpu. We've burnt up a fair share of cpu's over the years. Luckly on a Sun it isn't that big a deal.. but on x86. wel... you get the idea.

--
Jeff Trout <jeff(at)jefftrout(dot)com>
http://www.jefftrout.com/
http://www.stuarthamm.net/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michal Zaborowski 2003-11-15 15:05:57 Re: embedded postgresql + C++ IDE
Previous Message fuzzy 2003-11-15 13:33:27 Re: Can Postgresql run under Windows?