Re: Comparing databases

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Comparing databases
Date: 2003-11-13 04:07:31
Message-ID: 200311130407.hAD47VK16942@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

scott.marlowe wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:01:00AM -0500, Ned Lilly wrote:
> > > All I'm saying is that from the outside, IMHO, it just creates more
> > > problems than it solves. To use a favorite metaphor from this
> > > list, PHB's will read that and smell instability. I repeat, why
> > > volunteer it? Just say there are many firms providing support
> > > today, and it's used at X, Y, and Z companies.
> >
> > I second this.
>
> Me too. How about something along the lines of "Postgresql is supported
> by several different companies, ensuring that no one company can drive the
> project in any one direction against the best interests of the community"?

How about:

Me too. How about something along the lines of "Postgresql is supported
by several different companies, preventing vendor lock-in.
..........................

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2003-11-13 04:32:33 Re: Comparing databases
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2003-11-13 00:29:59 Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL