From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Comparing databases |
Date: | 2003-11-13 04:07:31 |
Message-ID: | 200311130407.hAD47VK16942@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
scott.marlowe wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:01:00AM -0500, Ned Lilly wrote:
> > > All I'm saying is that from the outside, IMHO, it just creates more
> > > problems than it solves. To use a favorite metaphor from this
> > > list, PHB's will read that and smell instability. I repeat, why
> > > volunteer it? Just say there are many firms providing support
> > > today, and it's used at X, Y, and Z companies.
> >
> > I second this.
>
> Me too. How about something along the lines of "Postgresql is supported
> by several different companies, ensuring that no one company can drive the
> project in any one direction against the best interests of the community"?
How about:
Me too. How about something along the lines of "Postgresql is supported
by several different companies, preventing vendor lock-in.
..........................
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2003-11-13 04:32:33 | Re: Comparing databases |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2003-11-13 00:29:59 | Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL |