| From: | Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org> | 
|---|---|
| To: | "Chris Field" <cfield(at)affinitysolutions(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Value of Quad vs. Dual Processor machine | 
| Date: | 2003-11-12 14:28:07 | 
| Message-ID: | 20031112092807.14b18bf4.threshar@torgo.978.org | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance | 
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 21:13:19 -0500
"Chris Field" <cfield(at)affinitysolutions(dot)com> wrote:
> we are looking at Xeon, We are currently running it on a quad sun v880
> compiled to be 64bit and have been getting dreadful performance.  I
> don't think we really have much to gain from going 64bit.
> 
> 
By chance, are you running 7.3.4 on that sun?
If so, try this:
export CFLAGS=-02
./configure
and rebuild PG.
Before 7.4 PG was build with _no_ optimization on Solaris. 
Recompiling gives __HUGE__ (notice the underscores) performance gains.
And onto the dual vs quad.
PG will only use 1 cpu / connection / query.
So if your machine iwll have 1-2 queries running at a time those other 2
proc's will sit around idling.  However if you are going to have a bunch
going, 4 cpus will be most useful.  One of hte nicest things to do for
PG is more ram and fast IO. It really loves those things.
good luck
-- 
Jeff Trout <jeff(at)jefftrout(dot)com>
http://www.jefftrout.com/
http://www.stuarthamm.net/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rajesh Kumar Mallah | 2003-11-12 14:47:26 | Suggestions for benchmarking 7.4RC2 against 7.3 | 
| Previous Message | Nick Fankhauser | 2003-11-12 13:34:50 | Seeking help with a query that takes too long |