| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Marko Karppinen <marko(at)karppinen(dot)fi>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: About the partial tarballs |
| Date: | 2003-11-12 04:25:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20031112002518.K56037@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Even if they weren't useful for anything else, I think there's value in the
> > developers having to consider what is optional and what is not. This need
> > for constant review probably reduces the chance of bloat, over time even
> > in the full tarball.
>
> How about dropping the partial tarballs and using the space savings to
> distribute a .tar.bz2 archive as well.
We already do ... started with beta1 of 7.4 ...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-11-12 04:46:34 | Re: ALTER TABLE modifications |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-12 04:06:47 | Re: ALTER TABLE modifications |