| From: | Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)myrealbox(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Temp rows - is it possible? |
| Date: | 2003-11-11 06:09:02 |
| Message-ID: | 200311111139.02338.shridhar_daithankar@myrealbox.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 02:16, Robert Creager wrote:
> When grilled further on (Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:39:32 -0500),
>
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> confessed:
> > We recently decided we had to forbid foreign-key references from temp
> > tables to permanent tables because of this effect. I wonder whether
> > we won't end up forbidding temp tables as children of permanent tables
> > too.
>
> Forbidding temp tables that inherit? That would suck (as someone who uses
> them). Would there be an alternate method to easily create a temp table
> that is identical to another?
You can use LIKE clause in create table.
See http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-createtable.html
HTH
Shridhar
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2003-11-11 06:13:47 | Re: PL/Perl returning multiple rows |
| Previous Message | Christopher Murtagh | 2003-11-11 06:02:21 | Re: PL/Perl returning multiple rows |