Re: status?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: status?
Date: 2003-11-10 23:45:13
Message-ID: 200311102345.hAANjDc05127@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32


I have applied the initdb in C from Andrew --- it is in CVS head now.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Merlin Moncure wrote:
>
> >Did your initdb/signals patch get accepted or is that still an open
> >item?
> >
> >Merlin
> >
> >
> >
> I have finished work on rewriting initdb in C - see
> http://www.dunslane.net/~andrew/Initdb_In_C.html . I guess Bruce will
> merge it when he gets time (presumably after this release is wrapped up).
>
> This wasn't so much a patch as a complete re-implementation from scratch
> - signal handling was just a very small part of it.
>
> But it can't really be thoroughly tested on W32 until we have a working
> backend - I am assuming at that stage some tweaks will be required.
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

  • Re: status? at 2003-10-31 18:53:12 from Andrew Dunstan

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-11-11 00:04:19 Re: Committing Resources to Win32
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-10 23:02:32 Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C