Re: Temp rows - is it possible?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Boris Popov <boris(at)procedium(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mattias Kregert <mattias(at)kregert(dot)se>, TANIDA Yutaka <tanida(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Temp rows - is it possible?
Date: 2003-11-10 22:24:14
Message-ID: 200311102224.hAAMOEH22028@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 04:51:53PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Boris Popov wrote:
>
> > > I can do (listen "session:192.168.0.33:1.0.1";) and then just parse
> > > the relname from pg_listener to get the same effect, but you see why
> > > I'd like a different solution?
> >
> > Yes, I can see that being useful --- but I doubt we are going to modify
> > the db system to enable behavior for this case unless we can do it in an
> > area that doesn't make the db less useful for more general purposes.
>
> Probably having a disconnect callback could solve this problem.
> This is not the first time someone asks for this feature.

Actually, a connect/disconnection function call would be best. Is this
a TODO?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Murtagh 2003-11-10 22:36:53 Re: PL/Perl returning multiple rows
Previous Message Ron Johnson 2003-11-10 22:22:12 Re: Why does primary key violation cause an abort?