Re: [HACKERS] BEGIN vs START TRANSACTION

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] BEGIN vs START TRANSACTION
Date: 2003-11-09 14:05:11
Message-ID: 200311091405.hA9E5BM06993@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > In fact, the BEGIN manual page says:
> >
> > <xref linkend="sql-start-transaction"
> > endterm="sql-start-transaction-title"> has the same functionality
> > as <command>BEGIN</>.
> >
> > which is currently not true because START TRANSACTION has additional
> > options.
>
> Then the that manual page should be fixed.
>
> > The following patch fixes it. I will put it into 7.5 after an
> > appropriate delay.
>
> I object to adding unnecessary complications like that.

Shouldn't BEGIN and START TRANSACTION have the same mechanics? The
changes to the code were the addition of only one line. The rest of the
patch was docs.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-09 14:12:46 Re: Coding help
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-11-09 10:10:18 Re: Coding help

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-09 14:16:13 Re: WIN32_DEV CVS branch
Previous Message Jochem van Dieten 2003-11-09 11:10:45 Re: WIN32_DEV CVS branch