| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Rich Seiersen" <rich67dev(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: plpgsql question |
| Date: | 2003-11-09 00:14:55 |
| Message-ID: | 200311081614.55035.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Rich,
> That was my thought - I was fairly sure I fixed it though..... Do, really
> need to be specific in terms of type in terms of int, or can I put numeric,
INT and numeric are fairly different, and I believe that SRF return types are
very fussy about data types; I wouldn't be surprised if you got an error for
using an INT4 in place of an INT8.
> and for varchar(30) I can just put varchar in my type definition.
That I don't think will be a problem; varchar limits are indifferently
supported anyway.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | ow | 2003-11-09 02:10:12 | pg 7.4.rc1, Range query performance |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-11-08 23:46:35 | Re: plpgsql question |