Re: PostgreSQL License Question

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Paul Thomas <paul(at)tmsl(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Ryan Mack <rmack(at)mackman(dot)net>, "pgsql-general (at) postgresql (dot) org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL License Question
Date: 2003-11-06 23:01:50
Message-ID: 200311062301.hA6N1o809422@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Paul Thomas wrote:
> > but I was unable to find them in the archive. Also, please reply to me
> > directly, I am not subscribed.
> >
> > Thank you, Ryan Mack
>
> My understanding is that PostgreSQL's BSD-style license leaves you free to
> do whatever want with the it and that includes creating a commercial
> closed-source derived version. Unlike the GPL, there are no issues of
> derived works or licensing issues if you compile your software to include
> PostgreSQL headers or libraries. So develop whatever you want and release
> as either open or closed source as fits your needs.

I tell people the only BSD restriction is "don't sue us".

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2003-11-06 23:02:27 pg_stat_activity
Previous Message Craig O'Shannessy 2003-11-06 22:52:09 Optimiser desicion bringing system to its knees?