From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Chris Bowlby <excalibur(at)hub(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Schema boggle... |
Date: | 2003-11-06 05:01:58 |
Message-ID: | 200311052101.58892.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
Chris,
> Monolithic tables have their uses, I don't and wont contest that, however
> we've been using a monolithic structure in our current AMS distribution and
<snip>
> dataset. That and I'm more confident working on a 3D level, versus 2D, the
> schema levels introduce the third dimension into my structure and simplify
> visualizing how I want things to work.
TMI! TMI! Ok, I believe that it works for you. You've made a tradeoff,
though, and some operations that were simple in the old monolithic structure
will now be more difficult -- however worthwhile the overall tradeoff may be.
> resulting query as he suggested, I just need to learn plpgsql programming
> so that I can work out all of the details (Tom, I might bug you about that
> once in a while).
Just go ahead and post your PL/pgSQL questions to the list. There are people
on this list who've written thousands of lines of PL/pgSQL ...
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2003-11-06 05:11:19 | Re: equal() perf tweak |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-11-06 04:16:51 | Re: equal() perf tweak |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-11-06 05:15:39 | Re: avoid circular references |
Previous Message | Chris Bowlby | 2003-11-06 02:31:53 | Re: [HACKERS] Schema boggle... |