Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases

From: Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>
To: Marek Florianczyk <franki(at)tpi(dot)pl>
Cc: bruno(at)wolff(dot)to, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases
Date: 2003-11-05 18:23:49
Message-ID: 20031105132349.35849cd4.threshar@torgo.978.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On 05 Nov 2003 19:01:38 +0100
Marek Florianczyk <franki(at)tpi(dot)pl> wrote:

> and it works better, but no revelation, when I do "\d
> schemaname.table" it's better. I've to still wait about 10-30 sec. and
> now it's only 100 clients connected. :(
>

So it only goes slow with hundred(s) of clients connecting and
disconnecting?

I'm guessing the CPU is pretty pegged on the box.

--
Jeff Trout <jeff(at)jefftrout(dot)com>
http://www.jefftrout.com/
http://www.stuarthamm.net/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marek Florianczyk 2003-11-05 18:30:55 Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases
Previous Message Marek Florianczyk 2003-11-05 18:23:36 Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases