From: | Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Marek Florianczyk <franki(at)tpi(dot)pl> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases |
Date: | 2003-11-05 13:48:52 |
Message-ID: | 20031105084852.04d6cfb9.threshar@torgo.978.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On 05 Nov 2003 14:33:33 +0100
Marek Florianczyk <franki(at)tpi(dot)pl> wrote:
>
> During this test I was changing some parameters in postgres, and send
> kill -HUP ( pg_ctl reload ). I still don't know what settings will be
> best for me, except "shared buffers", and some kernel and shell
> settings.
>
as far as I know, -HUP won't make things like shared buffer changes
take. you need a full restart of PG.
..
but your numbers are different... I guess it did take. huh.
..
how much disk IO is going on during these tests? (vmstat 1)
Any swapping (also shown in vmstat)
Where any of these tables analyze'd?
I see you used no indexes, so on each of your tables it must do a seq
scan. Try adding an index to your test tables and rerun..
--
Jeff Trout <jeff(at)jefftrout(dot)com>
http://www.jefftrout.com/
http://www.stuarthamm.net/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marek Florianczyk | 2003-11-05 15:14:59 | Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases |
Previous Message | Marek Florianczyk | 2003-11-05 13:33:33 | Re: performance problem - 10.000 databases |