From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 7.4RC1 planned for Monday |
Date: | 2003-10-31 04:13:53 |
Message-ID: | 200310310413.h9V4Drv11452@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > Nope, not for those items. There is still some thought of a very short
> > release cycle (a few months) for 7.5, and we could possibly address the
> > vacuum issue in that timeframe, if the recent ideas about it prove out.
> > But there is no consensus on how to fix the integer-index issues, and
> > I'm not willing to hold 7.4 (or even 7.5) hostage to finding one.
>
> The idea of very short release cycle for 7.5 is interesting. What is
> the core's decision for point-in-time-recovery? Maybe the decision is
> 7.5 does not include point-in-time-recovery?
I believe we were thinking PITR or Win32, or both could trigger a short
7.5 release cycle. However, it doesn't seem either is ready.
If we do a short cycle, will we have enough features to justify a
release? We could try to get PITR and Win32 done by January 1 and see
if that can happen.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2003-10-31 04:30:58 | Re: 7.4RC1 planned for Monday |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2003-10-31 04:00:54 | Re: 7.4 and 7.3.5 showstopper |