Re: Performace question

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Lada 'Ray' Lostak <ray(at)unreal64(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Sigi <sieglt(at)unreal64(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Performace question
Date: 2003-10-29 17:38:02
Message-ID: 20031029173802.GB13614@dcc.uchile.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 05:42:30PM +0100, Lada 'Ray' Lostak wrote:

> >Secondly, the queries that are varying so much, can you post the EXPLAIN
> >ANALYZE output so we can see what is actually going on.
> Thx, ANALYZE was good idea. Here it comes - right now, there is index on
> 'cluster' (BTREE) @ dtditems. But it was not used - I guess because reading
> & seraching will cost more than pure seq scan on 'few' items...

Hmm... have you tried running VACUUM periodically?

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"En las profundidades de nuestro inconsciente hay una obsesiva necesidad
de un universo lógico y coherente. Pero el universo real se halla siempre
un paso más allá de la lógica" (Irulan)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paulo Jan 2003-10-29 17:38:33 Database design question: ugliness or referential integrity?
Previous Message Åsmund Kveim Lie 2003-10-29 17:22:22 Cartesian product bug?