| From: | Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Open items |
| Date: | 2003-10-28 13:54:54 |
| Message-ID: | 20031028135454.C11167@quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 11:32:45PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Have gcc use -g, add --disable-debug, rename?
>
> Personally I don't like the idea of this behavior defaulting differently
> depending on which compiler you use. I can see the practical arguments
> for doing so, but it still rubs me the wrong way. Can anyone offer new
> arguments pro or con here?
Not an argument.. I use gcc, and I configure --enable-debug --enable-cassert.
I was surprised reading the discussion that the "--enable-debug" was
superfluous and thought it didn't "feel right"..
Cheers,
Patrick
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2003-10-28 13:56:56 | Re: Open items |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2003-10-28 13:21:37 | Re: Open items |