Re: Call for port reports

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Marko Karppinen <marko(at)karppinen(dot)fi>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Call for port reports
Date: 2003-10-24 20:45:19
Message-ID: 200310242045.h9OKjJ422310@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Ports list updated:

http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/supported-platforms.html

I saw in your diff:

! psql: could not fork new process for connection: Resource temporarily
unavailable

so I figured it was something related to resources.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marko Karppinen wrote:
> I'm just being an idiot, it's obviously a limits problem on the
> platform.
> It has a default max user processes limit of 100, which I was hitting.
> I shut down a bunch of desktop apps, and it's now passing:
>
> 92 of 93 tests passed, 1 failed test(s) ignored.
> (random was the one failing).
>
> So I guess you can add it to the list.
>
> mk
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-24 20:48:25 Re: Call for port reports
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-24 20:38:51 Re: Call for port reports