Re: 7.4 compatibility question

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.4 compatibility question
Date: 2003-10-24 13:25:42
Message-ID: 20031024132542.GF14655@dcc.uchile.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 03:11:25PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut writes:
>
> > Heck, ECPG has a full Informix compatibility mode and there is no
> > mention of that anywhere, because there was no commit "Add Informix
> > mode."

I still wonder what "Informix compatibility mode" means. Is it that you
can take an embedded-C program from Informix and compile it with ECPG?

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Doing what he did amounts to sticking his fingers under the hood of the
implementation; if he gets his fingers burnt, it's his problem." (Tom Lane)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-24 14:08:33 Re: 7.4 compatibility question
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-10-24 13:11:25 Re: 7.4 compatibility question

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-24 14:01:04 Re: Still a few flaws in configure's default CFLAGS selection
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-10-24 13:11:25 Re: 7.4 compatibility question