Re: vacuum locking

From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: vacuum locking
Date: 2003-10-23 10:14:25
Message-ID: 20031023101425.GC16878@libertyrms.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 09:27:47PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> trace. What is causing that? Not VACUUM I don't think. It doesn't have
> any huge memory demand. But swapping out processes could account for

What about if you've set vacuum_mem too high?

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Pagakis 2003-10-23 12:21:03 Performance Concern
Previous Message Alexander Priem 2003-10-23 08:40:58 RedHat Enterprise Linux ES 3 ?!?!