Re: Last beta ... we hope?

From: Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Last beta ... we hope?
Date: 2003-10-22 15:43:01
Message-ID: 200310221743.01845.andreak@officenet.no
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 22 October 2003 16:21, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> 'K, I packaged it up last night so that the ftp mirrors could get up to
> date on it ... I'm going to put out an announce to -general and -announce
> on this later this evening, but if someone wants to take a quick scan of
> the tar ball to make sure that it all looks okay to them, that would be
> great ...

So, is an initdb from beta4 required or not?

- --
Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no>
Managing Director, Senior Software Developer
OfficeNet AS

- - Writing software is more fun than working.

gpg public_key: http://dev.officenet.no/~andreak/public_key.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/lqWFUopImDh2gfQRArKoAJwPMmF1fE2NiTQX4yKNQuCH+5NokACggzOO
V8w4FFh0Tbvqcce3mLUDZx4=
=B+bj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2003-10-22 16:08:14 Re: Last beta ... we hope?
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2003-10-22 15:03:09 Re: integer ceiling in LIMIT and OFFSET

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2003-10-22 16:08:14 Re: Last beta ... we hope?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-10-22 14:21:50 Last beta ... we hope?