From: | Pedro Alves <pmalves(at)think(dot)pt> |
---|---|
To: | Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> |
Cc: | Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)myrealbox(dot)com>, PostGreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Same conditions, different planning? |
Date: | 2003-10-22 13:05:57 |
Message-ID: | 20031022130557.GA1014@cosmos.inesc.pt |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hum... no, I didn't :/ I thought vacuum analyze would be enough. Next
time (neve, I hope) I will have that in mind
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 08:36:10AM -0400, Doug McNaught wrote:
> Pedro Alves <pmalves(at)think(dot)pt> writes:
>
> > As a final attempt I tryed a pg_dumpall; initdb; psql -f <file> . It
> > seems to work as expected.... (!)
>
> It may have been a case of index bloat--did you ever REINDEX? That
> might have fixed it without a dump/reload.
>
> 7.4 has fixes for the index bloat problem.
>
> -Doug
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
--
Pedro Miguel G. Alves pmalves(at)think(dot)pt
THINK - Tecnologias de Informação www.think.pt
Tel: +351 21 413 46 00 Av. José Gomes Ferreira
Fax: +351 21 413 46 09 nº 13 1495-139 ALGÉS
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Overholt | 2003-10-22 13:07:57 | Re: [PORTS] Redhat RPMs |
Previous Message | Andrew Overholt | 2003-10-22 13:02:20 |