From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Automatic compat checking? (was 7.4 compatibility question) |
Date: | 2003-10-22 09:30:52 |
Message-ID: | 200310221030.52736.dev@archonet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 07:37, Neil Conway wrote:
> The second audience is the people who are really interested in exactly
> what has changed between the new release of PostgreSQL and the previous
> release series. It is important that we make it easy for an admin
> planning a PostgreSQL upgrade at a fairly large site to be able to see
> what changes in PostgreSQL have been made, and what changes will be
> necessary in their own applications.
Something I was pondering the other day was whether a pg_compat_chk utility
would be practical/desirable. You run it against your existing database /
schema dump and it prints a set of warnings:
Old version = 7.2.1
New version = 7.4.0
Warning: schema support introduced (v7.3)
all objects will be placed in the default schema
Failure: DEFAULT 'now' not supported (v7.4)
table1.column2
table2.column3
Notice: timestamp now holds milliseconds by default (v7.3)
tableX.whatever
My main concern would be that a 90% solution might be worse than nothing at
all.
Incidentally, this is not idle speculation, but something I might well have
time to stick in gborg during the 7.5 devt cycle.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-22 17:12:20 | Re: 7.4 compatibility question |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2003-10-22 06:37:57 | Re: 7.4 compatibility question |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jochen Westland [invigo] | 2003-10-22 09:47:02 | round() function wrong? |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-10-22 09:26:50 | Re: Timestamp docs weirdness |