From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Sadedin <pg_sicko(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: poor cpu utilization on dual cpu box |
Date: | 2003-10-22 16:11:14 |
Message-ID: | 200310220911.14853.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Simon,
> The issue is that no matter how much query load we throw at our server it
> seems almost impossible to get it to utilize more than 50% cpu on a
> dual-cpu box. For a single connection we can use all of one CPU, but
> multiple connections fail to increase the overall utilization (although
> they do cause it to spread across CPUs).
This is perfectly normal. It's a rare x86 machine (read fiber channel) where
you don't saturate the I/O or the RAM *long* before you saturate the CPU.
Transactional databases are an I/O intensive operation, not a CPU-intensive
one.
> We are running with shared buffers large enough to hold the
> entire database
Which is bad. This is not what shared buffers are for. See:
http://www.varlena.com/varlena/GeneralBits/Tidbits/perf.html
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rhaoni Chiu Pereira | 2003-10-22 16:21:37 | Re: [PERFORM] Low Insert/Update Performance |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-10-22 16:06:35 | Re: Postgresql performance |