| From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Tuning for mid-size server |
| Date: | 2003-10-21 20:55:04 |
| Message-ID: | 20031021205504.GJ11421@libertyrms.info |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 11:51:02AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Of course, if you have anecdotal evidence to the contrary, then the
> only way to work this would be to have OSDL help us sort it out.
Nope. I too have such anecdotal evidence that 25% is way too high.
It also seems to depend pretty heavily on what you're trying to
optimise for and what platform you have. But I'm glad to hear
(again) that people seem to think the 25% too high for most cases. I
don't feel so much like I'm tilting against windmills.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-10-21 21:11:17 | Re: Tuning for mid-size server |
| Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-10-21 20:36:01 | RAID controllers etc... was: PostgreSQL data on a NAS device ? |