Re: Tuning for mid-size server

From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tuning for mid-size server
Date: 2003-10-21 17:48:52
Message-ID: 20031021174852.GG11421@libertyrms.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 10:12:15AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> So what is the ceiling on 32-bit processors for RAM? Most of the 64-bit
> vendors are pushing Athalon64 and G5 as "breaking the 4GB barrier", and even
> I can do the math on 2^32. All these 64-bit vendors, then, are talking
> about the limit on ram *per application* and not per machine?

Or per same-time access. Remember that, back in the old days on the
pre-386s, accessing the extended or expanded memory (anyone remember
which was which?) involved some fairly serious work, and not
everything was seamless. I expect something similar is at work here.
Not that I've had a reason to play with 4G ix86 machines, anyway.

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff 2003-10-21 17:50:15 Re: Tuning for mid-size server
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2003-10-21 17:33:43 Re: Tuning for mid-size server