Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?
Date: 2003-10-21 15:55:21
Message-ID: 200310211555.h9LFtLK22606@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> I guess my question would be how many people are using information
> >> schemas vs. have loaded databases they don't want to reload.
>
> > We are still in beta, not RC ... why is this even an issue?
>
> Given that no one's squawked, I think it isn't...

We try to limit initdb in late betas --- that has always been our
process. I don't have any problem with the initdb, though.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yann Michel 2003-10-21 16:06:13 suspicius behaviour during delete
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-21 15:51:44 Re: A couple of TODO notes