From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_ctl reload - is it safe? |
Date: | 2003-10-14 20:02:48 |
Message-ID: | 200310142002.h9EK2m725847@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
wscott.marlowe wrote:
> > If you use "intr" then this type of thing can happen. Lots of programs assume
> > the unix semantics for disk accesses. You can get all kinds of bugs when
> > they're violated.
> >
> > If you use "soft" then the consequences can be much much worse. If your
> > fileserver were to reboot you could silently lose disk writes corrupting your
> > database.
>
> What if the WAL was local on disk, and the data was going to nfs storage,
> would that be safe, or saferer? :-)
Not sure --- we do a sync() on the entire machine before recycling the WAL logs.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2003-10-14 20:13:01 | Re: postgres --help-config |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-14 20:01:32 | Re: fix for strict-alias warnings |