Re: Temporary tables and miscellaneous schemas

From: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: btober(at)seaworthysys(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Temporary tables and miscellaneous schemas
Date: 2003-10-13 20:19:57
Message-ID: 20031013201957.GU86551@perrin.nxad.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> > Why wouldn't you want to hide pg_temp_*?
>
> So you could see your own temp tables, for instance.
>
> I dislike putting random restrictions on what the \d displays will
> show. We have done this in the past (eg, \df doesn't show things it
> thinks are I/O functions) and by and large it's been a mistake; I
> think it's created more confusion than it's prevented.
>
> I certainly don't think there is any justification for exposing
> pg_toast if we are going to hide other "system" schemas. There is
> no normal reason for needing to access toast tables directly, and
> it's only an implementation artifact that they have names at all.

Hrm... psql's unfortunately an SQL interface to PostgreSQL and an
administration tool. What would you say to adding a -P switch (power
user) to psql that'd disable any information hiding: the default would
be to hide non-critical areas including pg_catalog, pg_toast,
template1, and template0. \set POWERUSER would also work to toggle
this.. or just have \P toggle this mode. Thoughts?

-sc

--
Sean Chittenden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-10-13 20:33:22 Re: Temporary tables and miscellaneous schemas
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-10-13 20:12:54 Re: Temporary tables and miscellaneous schemas