From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: need for concrete info |
Date: | 2003-10-12 03:04:28 |
Message-ID: | 20031012030428.GI19057@libertyrms.info |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 05:48:23PM -0700, Dennis Gearon wrote:
> projects.) I want to use as my main argument, the fact (at this time,
> only from my previous usage), that MySQL really doesn't have foreign
> keys or record locking, and Postgres does.
Define "really". Certainly, for some cases, it now does.
> correct with today's MySQL vs. PostgreSQL, right? I *really* want to use
> PostgreSQL for this project and not MySQL as I want to avoid growing
> pains trying to get MySQL to do the job of a bigger DB down the road.
Why don't you make the "growing pains" argument instead? What are
those arguments, anyway? ( I think I know, but maybe not.)
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Network Administrator | 2003-10-12 04:34:07 | Re: need for concrete info |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-10-12 02:43:35 | Re: go for a script! / ex: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |