Re: compile warning

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: compile warning
Date: 2003-10-11 16:40:50
Message-ID: 20031011164049.GA2860@dcc.uchile.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 12:31:35PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Agreed. Patch applied. I was confused because the original posted URL
> mentioned unions, which was a different alignment issue from just
> structure pointer compatibility.

In the article Andrew mentioned, it is said that the unions thingie is a
GCC extension for solving the problem, thus unportable.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"If it wasn't for my companion, I believe I'd be having
the time of my life" (John Dunbar)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2003-10-11 16:42:09 Re: compile warning
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-11 16:31:35 Re: compile warning