| From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 2-phase commit |
| Date: | 2003-10-10 19:09:31 |
| Message-ID: | 20031010190931.GU16336@libertyrms.info |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:53:46PM -0400, Christopher Browne wrote:
>
> If 2PC gets implemented, that simply means that there will be another
> module that some will be interested in, and which many people won't
> bother using. Which shouldn't seem to be a particularly big deal.
I think the reason this is controversial, however, is that while PL/R
(e.g.) doesn't make big changes to the internals, 2PC certainly will
touch the fundamentals.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-10-10 19:24:54 | Re: compile warning |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-10-10 19:02:55 | Re: 2-phase commit |