From: | elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | CSN <cool_screen_name90001(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: int1? types? |
Date: | 2003-10-10 23:53:55 |
Message-ID: | 20031010165355.D6483@cookie.varlena.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I don't think that you can create a genuine one byte datatype.
The resulting type would probably be four bytes long, even if
you create a one byte by-value data type. The one byte would
be packaged in a 4 byte container for passing around the server.
Can anyone confirm or deny this? This was certainly the
case in Informix and Illustra.
--elein
elein(at)varlena(dot)com
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 11:37:14AM -0700, CSN wrote:
>
> Would you be able to roll your own int1's with types?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.3/interactive/xtypes.html
>
> CSN
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
> http://shopping.yahoo.com
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2003-10-10 23:56:39 | Re: log_duration and \timing times repeatably much higher than "Total runtime" from explain analyze |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2003-10-10 23:15:37 | Re: Replication Bundled with Main Source. |