Re: Sun performance - Major discovery!

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sun performance - Major discovery!
Date: 2003-10-09 17:57:58
Message-ID: 200310091757.h99Hvw611440@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 01:04:23PM -0400, Jeff wrote:
> >
> > So you think we should leave PG alone and let it run horrifically slowly?
> > Do you have a better idea of how to do this?
>
> Given the point in the release cycle, mightn't the FAQ_Solaris or
> some other place be better for this for now? I agree with the
> concern. I'd rather have slow'n'stable than fast-but-broken.

FAQ added.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-10-09 17:59:03 Re: [PERFORM] OFFTOPIC: PostgreSQL vs MySQL
Previous Message David Griffiths 2003-10-09 17:30:07 Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL