Re: Sun performance - Major discovery!

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sun performance - Major discovery!
Date: 2003-10-09 15:51:30
Message-ID: 200310091551.h99FpUa07732@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Jeff wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >
> > What is the performance win for the -fast flag again?
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> 52 seconds to 19-20 seconds

Wow, that's dramatic. Do you want to propose some flags for non-gcc
Solaris? Is -fast the only one? Is there one that suppresses those
warnings or are they OK?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff 2003-10-09 16:07:20 Re: Sun performance - Major discovery!
Previous Message Jeff 2003-10-09 15:45:24 Re: Sun performance - Major discovery!