Re: 2-phase commit

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 2-phase commit
Date: 2003-10-09 15:26:47
Message-ID: 200310091526.h99FQlG04455@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > If you want cross-server transactions, what other methods are there that
> > are more reliable?
>
> 3-phase commit

OK, how is that going to make thing safer, or does it just shrink the
failure window smaller?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2003-10-09 15:45:33 Re: 2-phase commit
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-09 15:25:42 Re: _GNU_SOURCE