Re: missing COMMENT ON objects

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, momjian(at)svr1(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: missing COMMENT ON objects
Date: 2003-10-09 03:17:38
Message-ID: 200310090317.h993Hc710234@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Added, yes, a 7.5 item.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> >>I notice you cannot COMMENT ON the following:
> >>* Cast
> >>* Conversion
> >>* Operator class
> >>Is that a deliberate omission, or is it an oversight?
> >
> >
> > Unimplemented feature AFAIR. BTW, if you feel like doing something
> > about this, COMMENT ON LARGE OBJECT <oid> would be good too.
>
> * COMMENT ON [ CAST | CONVERSION | OPERATOR CLASS | LARGE OBJECT ]
>
> Bruce - want to make this a TODO? May as well assign it to me - I'll
> have a play with it. I assume this is a post-7.4 item?
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-09 03:19:51 Re: [HACKERS] Sun performance - Major discovery!
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-10-09 03:17:26 Re: missing COMMENT ON objects