From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Thoughts on maintaining 7.3 |
Date: | 2003-10-07 15:58:26 |
Message-ID: | 200310071558.h97FwQS14257@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >Agreed. Great Bridge was going to test our releases and only distribute
> >the good ones --- obviously they were thinking of Linux kernels and not
> >PostgreSQL. You almost need a commercial company to do testing with
> >Linux kernels. PostgreSQL doesn't require this, and I think Linux is
> >popular _in_ _spite_ of their buggy backported kernels (odd numbers?),
> >not because of it.
> >
> >
> >
> The reason there is a lot of backporting in Linux kernels is that there
> is such a lot of time (2 years or more) between major kernel releases.
> This is not surprising given the kernel's complexity, but it is not the
> case here, with releases every 6 months or so.
But the kernel goes through this reliable/unreliable cycle --- they
would be better off just making the old kernel more and more reliable
and focusing on the new kernel for features.
The reliable/unreliable cycle will kill your user base.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-10-07 16:39:43 | Re: Disabling function validation |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-10-07 15:52:42 | Re: Thoughts on maintaining 7.3 |