Re: Thoughts on maintaining 7.3

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Thoughts on maintaining 7.3
Date: 2003-10-07 15:58:26
Message-ID: 200310071558.h97FwQS14257@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >Agreed. Great Bridge was going to test our releases and only distribute
> >the good ones --- obviously they were thinking of Linux kernels and not
> >PostgreSQL. You almost need a commercial company to do testing with
> >Linux kernels. PostgreSQL doesn't require this, and I think Linux is
> >popular _in_ _spite_ of their buggy backported kernels (odd numbers?),
> >not because of it.
> >
> >
> >
> The reason there is a lot of backporting in Linux kernels is that there
> is such a lot of time (2 years or more) between major kernel releases.
> This is not surprising given the kernel's complexity, but it is not the
> case here, with releases every 6 months or so.

But the kernel goes through this reliable/unreliable cycle --- they
would be better off just making the old kernel more and more reliable
and focusing on the new kernel for features.

The reliable/unreliable cycle will kill your user base.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-10-07 16:39:43 Re: Disabling function validation
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-10-07 15:52:42 Re: Thoughts on maintaining 7.3