| From: | Stef <svb(at)ucs(dot)co(dot)za> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Postgres low end processing. |
| Date: | 2003-10-03 14:30:40 |
| Message-ID: | 20031003163040.3641f39a.svb@ucs.co.za |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
Hi everyone,
I've been trying to find out if some guidelines
exist, somewhere, describing how postgres
can possibly run on less than 8MB of RAM.
(Disk space not an issue).
The closest thread I could find in the list
archives is :
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2002-06/msg01343.php
Is it possible to have a stripped-down version of
postgres that will use an absolute minimal amount
of memory?
Maybe by switching off some features/options
at compile time, and/or configuration tweaks?
(Or anything else)
This will be on very low end i386 architecture.
Performance penalties are expected and
will be accepted. I will need the
functionality of >= 7.3.4 , at least.
Any help will be much appreciated.
Regards
Stef
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-03 14:32:20 | Re: Type of application that use PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-10-03 14:28:12 | Re: pg_restore takes ages |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-10-03 14:47:43 | Re: Is This My Speed Limit? |
| Previous Message | Jeff | 2003-10-03 12:36:42 | Re: count(*) slow on large tables |