From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Thoughts on maintaining 7.3 |
Date: | 2003-10-03 16:47:58 |
Message-ID: | 20031003134416.O37588@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> >Yes, please. Please, please do not force all users to accept new
> >features in "stable" trees.
> >
> >
> What if the feature does break compatibility with old features?
> What if it is "truly" a new feature?
>
> One example would be that we are considering reworking
> pg_dump/restore a bit to support batch uploads and interactive mode.
> It would not break compatibility with anything but would
> greatly enhance one's ability to actually backup and restore
> large volume sets.
for stuff like this, why not just break off a gborg project for it,
seperate from the distros? We could pull in the changes as beta starts on
a dev cycle, but then pg_dump/pg_restore could be maintained on its own
release cycle, and you could easily get 'back features' in like this ...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2003-10-03 16:55:42 | Re: minor view creation weirdness |
Previous Message | Doug McNaught | 2003-10-03 16:39:55 | Re: Thoughts on maintaining 7.3 |