| From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Thoughts on maintaining 7.3 |
| Date: | 2003-10-02 19:15:33 |
| Message-ID: | 20031002191533.GA18417@wolff.to |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 10:47:06 -0700,
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Possible scenario for maintaining 7.3:
>
> Only one or two committers using a two stage cvs... one stage for
> testing (not including sandbox), one stage for commit.
> Scheduled releases based on non-critical fixes. Quarterly? Of course
> critical fixes should be released as soon as plausible.
>
> Separate mailing list for 7.3 issues, concerns etc... Which would help
> develop it's own temporary community.
>
> Thoughts?
It might be better to split into two different trees. One just gets bug fixes,
the other gets bug fixes plus enhancements that won't require an initdb.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dror Matalon | 2003-10-02 19:15:47 | count(*) slow on large tables |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-02 19:10:46 | Re: Large block size problems and notes... |