From: | Harry Broomhall <harry(dot)broomhall(at)uk(dot)easynet(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | jeff_eckermann(at)yahoo(dot)com (Jeff Eckermann) |
Cc: | pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Schemas, and visibility of tables in MS-Query. |
Date: | 2003-10-01 15:03:46 |
Message-ID: | 200310011503.QAA97905@haeb.noc.uk.easynet.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice pgsql-odbc |
Jeff Eckermann writes:
[SNIP]
>
> Harry,
>
> I haven't worked with this to know what the issues
> might be. I believe I remember seeing a similar
> question come up before, but a quick archives search
> brings up nothing useful.
>
> I am forwarding your message to the pgsql-odbc list,
> where you are more likely to get a helpful reply. If
> you have not yet subscribed to that list, you may wish
> to now.
>
> Sorry I don't know enough about this feature to
> diagnose your problems.
>
Many thanks for taking the time nonetheless.
I am already subscribed to the ODBC list - and was wondering if that
was a better fit!
Regards,
Harry.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jason Hihn | 2003-10-01 15:13:15 | Ideal Hardware? |
Previous Message | Louise Cofield | 2003-10-01 14:53:41 | Re: SELECT syntax question - combining COUNT and DISTINCT |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ben Trewern | 2003-10-01 15:34:49 | Re: FUD!! ODBC will not be supported by Microsoft in the future |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-01 14:48:34 | Re: Schemas, and visibility of tables in MS-Query. |